Don’t just Protest—get Permanent Constitutional Ability to Curb "Big Money" and Repair Congress

This Amendment is to improve representative government—not to weaken it but to make it stronger. Main

Home Amendment Campaign Practical Issues Accessories

  Constitutional checks and balances are no longer adequate and need amending.
State Bills

Sub Menu:

Campaign State Bills Lobby Legislators Grassroots Action Petition Presentations Support & Opp'n Voter Demographics



  Generic State Referendum Bill Nonbinding State Bills of Support  

Generic Nationwide
Ballot Initiatives Amendment Bill:

A Generic State Referendum Draft Bill for
an Application to Congress for a Convention
to Propose a U.S. Citizens' Initiatives Amendment

Print and download formats:  Adobe PDF, Word DOC



The purpose of this Generic State Legislative Bill is to serve as a reference for state legislation to initiate the Nationwide Ballot Initiatives Constitutional Amendment process.

Variants of this bill can be adapted in all 50 states to processes as legislation alone without a referendum.

However, the generic version shown here is for the preferred method—a legislature-initiated referendum process. This combines the authority of the States and of the People with overwhelming constitutional implications. A statute referendum process is available in 23 states (AZ, AR, CA, DE, ID, IL, KY, ME, MD, MA, MI, MO, MT, NE, NV, NM, ND, OH, OK, OR, SD, UT, and WA). The remaining states all have other forms of referendum process, primarily constitutional, for which variants of the generic bill may be permissible.

It can also serve as a reference for direct statute initiatives in 14 states (AZ, AR, CA, CO, ID, MO, MT, NE, ND, OK, OR, SD, UT, and WA). Conceivably, it might be adapted for the 5 states (FL, IL, MI, NV, and OH) that have direct constitutional initiatives or the 5 states (AK, ME, MA, MS, and WY) that have indirect legislative or indirect constitutional initiatives.

A State can modify this draft to meet their specific requirements. It anticipates and avoids potential problems in the amendment procedures that Congress has neglected to specify. We offer the generic form below in the hope that it will be a convenient reference that may help to achieve "same subject" or "same general subject" applications to Congress and to do so without risk that Congress may challenge the States under Article I, Section 10, Clause 3 (Powers prohibited of States)..


Text of State Referendum Bill

State Bill Comments

AN ACT Relating to a ********** State Referendum for an application by the ********** State Legislature to the United States Congress. The application shall call for a Convention to propose an U.S. Constitutional Amendment authorizing U.S. Citizens’ Initiatives.


Each state has a standard format to start a bill formally. Eventually, it will generally include the bill number, the House, session, date, sponsoring legislators, etc.

The state application process has three steps:

  1. This bill initiates the referendum

  2. The referendum of the people:

    1. verifies the people's wishes and

    2. combines the moral authority and right of the People to alter their government with the constitutional duty and power of the State to do it

  3. A bill based on the referendum will apply to Congress for an Article V Convention of the States

Sec. 1. PROBLEM. Amongst many offenses against the people of ********** State, the U.S. Congress denies their constitutional rights in law or in principle:

  1. The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution explicitly intends the federal Government to promote the general well-being of the people. Instead, Congress excessively promotes special interests over the people's well-being.

  2. Article 1, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution asserts that the people shall choose their congressional representatives. To excess, Congress and special interests influence selection of the slate of candidates, financially exclude excellent candidates, influence candidate loyalties, and influence the media content presented to the public.

  3. These offences greatly harm the people, these United States and the State of **********. Currently, only Congress has the power to resolve these problems. Congress, however, has long demonstrated that it is unwilling to implement effective solutions and that it is unable to reform itself. Over many years, federal government has fully institutionalized the problems; they are now the intractable norm.

This perspective on the Problems addresses the constitutional issues to lay a foundation for the next section. The web page on more general range of Problems is probably too extensive and argumentative to be included in a bill. The form shown here is a rough equivalent of an indictment that includes two of the most egregious legal issues and omits naming other offences.

Sec. 2. RESPONSIBLY FOR SOLUTION. The State of ********** recognizes its responsibility to help produce a solution to these problems:

  1. The U.S. Declaration of Independence holds that “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive … it is the Right of the People to alter … it.”

  2. In Federalist #85, the Founding Fathers recognized that “the persons delegated to the administration of the national government will always be disinclined to yield up any portion of the authority of which they were once possessed.” They wrote the Constitution certain that “we may safely rely on the disposition of the State legislatures to erect barriers against the encroachments of the national authority.”

  3. In their wisdom, the Founding Fathers included in Article V a second method of amending the U.S. Constitution so that the States could resolve these types of problems, which are otherwise unsolvable by constitutional means.

  4. The ********** State Constitution states:

    (a) Article ***, Section ***: “All political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights.”

    (b) Article ***, Section ***: “All Elections shall be free and equal, and no power, civil or military, shall at any time interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage.”

    (c) Article ***, Section ***: “The first power reserved by the people is the initiative.”

This summarizes why state legislators must take action to resolve the problems. They have all take oaths of office to uphold their state duties. The web page on state support extensively argues the issues.

Every state constitution is different from the others and the wording of the bill in (iv) will be different. A web page addressing this topic shows some examples of specific wording.

Of course, the States may find a better or alternative solution. However, if they do not, then a failure of the States' responsibility to support this solution or its equal will be a profound blow to the constitutional foundations of the United States. In effect, the transformation of our Republic into a permanent surrogate plutocracy will become irreversible and our Constitutional process under Article V's Second Method will have failed the Founding Fathers' intention to control federal excesses.

Sec. 3. FORM OF SOLUTION. History has proved that Congress cannot protect the people against congressional excesses and deficiencies. Constitutional separation of powers bars such power from the President, Judiciary, or States. Appointed or elected reform boards cannot have this power. Constitutionally, this leaves only the people to protect against congressional excesses. However, congressional excesses have largely nullified the people’s federal voting power. To solve these problems therefore, there remains only the power of nationwide Citizens’ Initiatives.

In essence, the argument here is that this approach is the only one to do the job. A possible alternate is Senator Gravel's plan, but that appears to present other and greater difficulties.

Sec. 4. LEGISLATIVE INTENT. The Legislature’s responsibilities to the people compel action. ********** State shall support a Citizens’ Initiatives Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The intent of this act is to start a constitutional process that could lead to Citizens’ Initiatives for change. Given the nature of the legislation, the State shall seek the people's approval by referendum. If other states do likewise, referenda will also demonstrate the unity of the U.S. people and the States, bringing momentous constitutional authority to bear on any procedural disputes with Congress.

Passage of this bill is only the start of a lengthy process towards a constitutional amendment. Though the Sates have not had a Convention since the one framing the current Constitution, any Article V Second Method procedural disputes will pitch Congress against both the States and the People. Theoretically, at least, the States and the People carry great constitutional weight.

Sec. 5. PROTOTYPE TEXT OF INITIATIVES AMENDMENT. ********** State’s prototype text of the U.S. Citizens’ Initiatives Amendment for consideration by the Convention is shown in Appendix I.

The Convention of the States will generate the final text or, if Congress decides to preempt the Convention as it always has in the past, then by Congress's acceptance of the text. Thus, the application must be adequate to deny Congress the opportunity to water down or finesse the Amendment.

Sec. 6. LEGISLATURE APPLICATION. In accordance with Article V of the U.S. Constitution, the Legislature shall make the application. Upon approval of the referendum by the people of ********** State, the ********** State Legislature shall prepare and vote on a separate bill that applies to Congress to call a limited Convention for proposing only a Citizens’ Initiatives Amendment.

Under Article V, the state legislatures must apply to Congress for a Convention. Some states, however, believe that a non-literal interpretation is possible and that a state initiative or referendum can apply. However, this would introduce a non-essential issue, which Congress could use to delay the entire amendment process, perhaps for years.

In the past, Congress has found the idea of a limited convention far more acceptable than a general convention. Congress claims a general convention could become a runaway convention, though this is very doubtful. Nevertheless, a limited Convention on a single subject avoids another potential dispute.

The downside of a limited convention is that it enables Congress to preempt the convention by proposing the same amendment itself—as it has always done in the past. However, if Congress thwarted the States' will by proposing a watered-down amendment, then the States' should righteously apply for an immediate unlimited Convention to defend their State rights.

Sec. 7. AVOIDING DISPUTES. Congress has favored its retention of excessive powers by neglecting to specify the application procedures. Nevertheless, insofar as it is possible and reasonable, ********** State shall comply with the latest congressional draft bills, debates and research relating to the application procedures.

To avoid disputes with Congress, it is best to follow what documents are available on the way Congress should have defined the second method procedures. This will avoid several potential minefields that could cause delays and litigation in the Supreme Court.

Sec. 8. AGREEMENT OR COMPACT. ********** State may cooperate and coordinate with other States on a U.S. Citizens’ Initiatives Amendment, but shall not enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State contrary to Article 1 Section 10 Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution.

In the U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 10, Clause 3, the states are enjoined from not entering into any Agreement or Compact with another State. Again, this avoids a possible minefield.

Nevertheless, the States applications should be as nearly identical as possible, since the closer they are the more Congress is obliged to consider them "same subject" or "same general subject" and include them in the number of applications received. If this bill proves good enough for many states to use, it can help achieve this objective.

Sec. 9. APPLICATION PROCEDURES. The State shall conform to the constitutional conventions procedures bills considered in recent Congresses.

  1. Send two copies of the application to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives.

  2. Send the applications within thirty days of their adoption by the legislature.

  3. Certify the adoption and date adopted by the legislature’s Secretary of State or equivalent office.

  4. In addition, the States should designate their own recipient to whom a copy of all state application documents should be lodged and time-stamped for independent record keeping.

In general, by placing the application procedures in the bills, the states will have the same procedures without having to coordinate further.

Sec. 10. RESCIND OR RESUBMIT. Once made, ********** State shall not rescind its application. However, to revise or renew the application, the legislature may re-submit it to Congress. When resubmitting, the State may modify the application from that approved in the referendum, provided that the intentions and meanings in the referendum are retained. If the modifications are substantial, the State shall resubmit the revised act as a referendum to the people for their ratification before re-submitting it to Congress.

Congress has not clarified what happens when a state withdraws an application—another minefield to avoid. If a state demonstration of a boule (i.e., a citizens' initiatives assembly) reveals deficiencies, or if other states submit applications containing improvements, or if the time limit on the application is near expiry date, this state legislature may re-submit or renew its application.

Sec. 11. PASSAGE IN BOTH HOUSES. Both Houses shall pass this bill and the subsequent application by the Legislature in identical versions and the presiding officer of each House of shall sign the exact text of the resolution.

In the past, some States have passed applications in only one House and an appropriate officer did not sign the exact text. (Of course, the two-house requirement does not apply in Nebraska, which is the unicameral State.)

Sec. 12. CONVENTION DELEGATES OATH. Those attending the Convention shall take an oath that binds them morally and ethically to follow their State's wishes as generally described in this Bill.

Congress's fear of a runaway convention generates this assurance. Those attending the Convention act in a Federal Function. This means that their state oaths cannot legally bind them. Consequently, there can be no guarantee. Nevertheless, taking the oath provides a powerful moral and ethical incentive to comply with State wishes.

Sec. 13. TIME LIMIT FOR APPLICATIONS. This bill shall be inoperative after twenty-one years from the date of the submission hereof to the Congress, unless by this Legislature’s count the legislatures of two thirds of the several states shall have applied for a Convention for proposing a Citizens’ Initiatives Amendment.

This clarifies the amount of time that Congress must consider the application open. It prevents Congress from invoking the doctrine of laches to claim the application is no longer valid. This section is not essential, but sets a fairness standard that gives the next section more weight.

Twenty-one years is more than adequate time for one or more states to convert their initiatives signature petition qualification process to a Boule and to feed any relevant information into this Amendment.

Sec. 14. TIME LIMIT FOR CALLING THE CONVENTION. Congress shall call a Convention as required by Article V of the U.S. Constitution, in a timely manner not to exceed one year from the receipt of applications from two thirds of the States. If Congress prevaricates, procrastinates,  or denies the States’ Constitutional rights to hold an Article V Convention, this State shall join with other States to enforce the People's Rights by all means at their disposal, including those set forth in the Declaration of Independence.

In 1787, Congress called the original convention in under six months from application, so one year is entirely reasonable in today's speeded-up world. The important point about setting a time limit is that if Congress delays over one year, the states can sue in the U.S. Federal Court system and may invoke mandamus.

The Declaration of Independence states “…Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it…”

Sec. 15. REFERENDUM. The Secretary of State shall submit this act to the people for their adoption and ratification, or rejection, at the next general election to be held in this State, in accordance with Article ***, section *** of the state Constitution and the laws adopted to facilitate its operation.

Each state will have its own standard wording to initiate the referendum

Sec. 16. CAPTIONS. Part headings used in this act shall not constitute any part of the law.

Captions are to guide the reader, and are normally not included in the final version.

Sec. 17. REFERENCES. Information presented at the web site may help readers to understand the act, but shall not constitute any part of this law.

This reference is for the readers' information and convenience and a state may wish to omit it.

Sec. 18. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected.

Severability is a standard section in many state bills.

Sec. 19. DATE EFFECTIVE. This act shall take effect thirty days after ratification by the people.

The effective date is included for completeness.

Sec. 20. TITLE. This act shall be known as the U.S. Citizens’ Ballot Initiatives Act by the State of **********.

Many states require that the title should be part of the bill so that no one can later add a misleading title.

--- END ---


Appendix I

Text of the U.S. Citizens’ Ballot Initiatives Amendment for consideration by the Convention

Nationwide Ballot Initiatives
U.S. Constitution Amendment Text

Amendment Comments



1.1 Amendment X of the United States Constitution shall be, and hereby is, amended by appending the following sentence: "The first power reserved by the People is the Ballot Initiative."

The appropriate point to start this Initiatives Amendment is by modifying Amendment X - Powers of the States and People.

1.2 Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution shall be, and hereby is, amended by inserting the following phrase at the end of the sentence: ", and in the People through their power of Initiative".

Article I, Section 1 defines the allocation of "All legislative Powers". For clarity, this must be revised to include the People's new right of Ballot Initiative.

1.3 This Constitutional Amendment authorizes nationwide United States Citizens' Ballot Initiatives. It establishes a Boule (i.e., a U.S. Citizens' Initiatives Assembly) to manage the initiative process.

The Boule shall consist of a randomly selected cross-section of the People. The Boule shall be independent, protected from tampering, responsible only to the People, and funded by the U.S. Government as an inalienable entitlement of the People.

The Boule is an independent self-perpetuating organization of the People.

Constitutionally, this clause is almost sufficient if Congress were to complete the details. However, since Congress is a source of many problems that this Amendment will resolve, the People cannot allow Congress to furnish the details. Consequently, this Amendment is of necessity relatively lengthy and has two references.



2.1 U.S. citizen groups and organizations may create Proposed Initiatives but shall not abuse this right. All citizens and organizations signing or sponsoring a proposed Initiative shall declare any benefit they may receive by proposing and by passage of the Initiative. They shall communicate a Proposed Initiative to the Boule by its publication.

The Amendment taps the creativity of the People and their organizations to propose Initiatives. To keep order, the Boule has the power to control abuse.

2.2 Direct democracy by Initiatives shall be, and hereby is, authorized and granted to the People as an additional and parallel power to those granted to the U.S. Congress, and each House thereof, and to those powers that Congress has assumed, will assume, and could assume. Direct Initiatives shall have the power to do and undo all manner of things that Congress has done, does, and will do.

Direct Initiative powers shall include, but are not limited to: legislation, proposing amendments, calling conventions of the States to propose amendments, impeachment, implied powers including all powers under Article I Section 8 Clause 18, rules, policies, procedures, precedents and customs, appointments, remuneration, perquisites, and ethics. The sole limitation on the power of Initiatives shall be the exclusion of impeachment trials by the Senate under Article I Section 3 Clause 6.

The People must have equal authority to Congress to enforce checks and to correct deficiencies. Congress has been and will be creative at annulling constraints. No one can anticipate where future problems may lay—earmarks, voting rules, ethics, committee chairperson power, etc. Consequently, Initiatives must be able to address any congressional matters that the People deem necessary and may have to repeatedly remedy related issues.

Implied power, e.g., using the "basket clause," has required and enabled Congress to assume many things not in the Constitution. For maximum clarity, to avoid dispute with Congress, and to minimize need for Supreme Court interpretation, the basket clause and a list show specific matters Initiatives can address. By placing a sole limitation on the power of Initiative, the Supreme Court will be more likely bound to interpret that other powers are not limited.

Initiatives are the people's only permanent and certain method to assure that Congress operates, and knows that it must operate, for the People's benefit and not for the benefit of Congress, Congresspersons, or their friends.

2.3 The People voting on Direct Initiatives shall emulate electing congresspersons to vote exactly the People's will.

A majority Initiative vote of the People in a congressional district shall be the equivalent of the vote by its member of the House of Representatives. A majority initiative vote of the People in a State shall be the equivalent of the votes by its Senators.

To pass, a legislative Initiative shall require a majority vote in a majority of the congressional districts and in a majority of the States, i.e., a double majority. To pass, an Initiative containing a proposed Constitutional Amendment shall require a majority vote in a two-thirds majority of the congressional Districts and in a two-thirds majority of the States, i.e., a double supermajority.

Matters decided in Congress by committee or other subset thereof shall be as if a majority of members of that House had passed them. An Initiative addressing a House of Representatives' Committee issue shall require a majority vote in a majority of the congressional districts to pass. An Initiative addressing a Senate Committee issue shall require a majority vote in a majority of the states to pass. Joint committee issues shall require a double majority Initiative vote to pass.

In addition, an Initiative must always pass by a simple majority of the nationwide Electorate.

The voting majorities for initiatives follow the same majorities as those that the Constitution defined and Congress currently uses.

Statistical anomalies can occur in elections. Therefore, as a precaution, the Amendment also requires a simple nationwide majority to pass an Initiative.

Nationwide Initiatives will treat voting by any Committee or subset of Congress as if a majority vote of one or both Houses had passed the issue.

2.4 A Direct Initiative shall take effect when passed by the Electorate's vote and immediately after certification of the vote. A Direct Initiative shall not be subject to any veto. Congress shall not change or overrule a Direct Initiative except as permitted in the Direct Initiative.

A later Direct Initiative, or a nationwide Referendum with the same voting criteria as the Direct Initiative, may change or overrule an earlier Direct Initiative or Referendum.

The People cannot permit the President to veto Initiatives or the Congress to overrule Initiatives, otherwise the government could easily frustrate the purposes of this Amendment.

Congress does not currently have a referendum process in place, but may do so in the future. The Amendment gives initiatives and referenda equal precedence, the most recent prevailing.

2.5 Article V of the U.S. Constitution shall be, and hereby is, amended by adding a second clause consisting of the following two sentences: "The People shall have the power by Direct Initiatives to propose U.S. constitutional amendments to the States when passed by the Electorate's double supermajority vote. Upon certification of a passing vote, the proposed constitutional amendment shall be as if Congress had deemed it necessary, proposed it, defined the mode of ratification, and submitted it to the several States for ratification by their legislatures or by conventions."

In the future, the People's fundamental right to alter their government becomes more explicit by the power to propose constitutional amendments. This requires a revision of Article V. It is best introduced as a second clause rather than alter the first clause, which is already complex and upon which many judicial opinions rely.

Recent Supreme Court rulings — e.g., requiring constitutional rather than legislative process for term limits and line item veto — alone mandate inclusion of this clause.

Note that two-thirds of the Boule must approve the Constitutional Initiative before it gets on the ballot. Then, the People must approve it by a double supermajority vote. Finally, three-fourths of the states must still ratify it. Passage by this process will therefore be a more severe test. However, whereas Congress was reluctant to disturb their status quo, the People will probably use this process more.

2.6 The Boule shall submit Indirect Initiatives to Congress. Congress may change or overrule them. Within one year after submittal, Congress shall bring it to a conclusive vote in both Houses subject to Presidential veto or refer it back to the Boule. This shall not limit the People's right at any time to propose similar or related Direct Initiatives nor the Boule's right to place them on the ballot as Candidate Initiatives.

States seldom use their indirect initiative process. The Amendment's indirect process is easy to use. It will be efficient and effective to encourage Congress to take up matters without going to the time and cost of a nationwide vote.

2.7 Advisory Initiatives shall be non-binding polls of the nationwide Electorate.

Advisory (i.e., consultative) initiatives seek the People's guidance. For example, an advisory initiative may find acceptable common ground for nationwide compromise on complex issues or define the scope of a future initiative to avoid unnecessary discord.



3.1 Members shall be the People's sworn deputies obligated to act in the best interests for all U.S. citizens and their Constitutional rights. Members shall vote their own independent un-coerced opinion after open-minded deliberation. They shall not participate in voting for any group affiliation, vote trading, sale or favor. The Boule shall pay Members for their services.

Member's independence is important for the Boule to function effectively. It is necessary therefore, that special interest of Members should not form association within the Boule.

3.2 The Boule shall specify the random-selection method. It may vary its Membership criteria from all Citizens to a willing subset of Citizens, and from Citizens entitled to vote to Citizens registered to vote, by Direct Initiatives passed by a double supermajority vote.

Once selected, a Boule Member shall serve a mandatory duty of citizenship as a private person for a term specified by the Boule. Boule service shall have priority over other citizen's duties and work including professional, military, or business services.

Failure to serve and fulfill a Member's obligations shall be punishable unless excused for excessive hardship by a Federal Court in accordance with guidelines specified by the Boule. No Citizen may serve twice.

The Boule Rules state that a simple random sample from all Citizens entitled to vote must initially generate the list of Members. The executive branch will probably choose from the Social Security master list—removing those not eligible to serve from the selection. If a better database of Citizens becomes available, e.g., from Homeland Security, then that may be used.

Initially, all those selected must serve because it appears that permitting Members to decline for less than excessive hardship could permit large special interests to influence the Boule. Though service may sometimes be an imposition, it is a reasonable duty of citizenship.

3.3 The Boule shall be the sole authority to manage the initiative proposal process, to select and qualify all U.S. Candidate Initiatives, and to place them on nationwide ballots. The Boule shall obtain whatever advice and assistance it deems necessary. The Boule shall have the right to subpoena testimony and enforce that right through Federal Courts.

The Boule shall ensure that Candidate Initiatives are worthy and comprehensible and shall not overburden the Electorate. The Boule shall specify the requirements for citizen groups and organizations that may propose Initiatives, shall define abuse of the initiative process, and shall control the ease of proposing Initiatives.

State initiatives have indicated the number of Initiatives on which an electorate can reasonably vote. There must be a single authority to control the number of proposed Initiatives, prevent abuse, and to select the most important, otherwise the process will be chaotic.

The Boule must have powers to demand information similar to Congress to perform its check and balance function.

3.4 The Boule shall be self-governing in accordance with its Rules. It shall have the obligation and right to sustain itself. It shall obtain approval to change its budget and Members' remuneration by Direct Initiative. The U.S. Government shall deposit to the Boule's account its total annual budget one month in advance of its initial convocation and each anniversary thereof.

If the budget in not available, the Boule shall have the power to borrow on the credit of the United States. If U.S. government sources are unavailable, this Amendment may be funded by philanthropic sources and the States.

The Boule shall be exempt from taxes or levies. The Boule may incorporate and dissolve in States of its choice. For legal action against them, this Amendment grants the Boule and its Members the same protections and immunities as Congress and congresspersons.

Whereas Congress can change all congressional rules, the rules constituting the Boule's Charter require Direct Initiative approval of the People. In this way, the People assume full control of the Boule and the Initiative process insofar as they do not violate the Constitution—government is not involved.

To give the Boule a defined legal status, it can incorporate itself. However, litigation can breach corporate shields with relative ease, so the Members must have legal protection against potential personal attacks. Congressional protection has proved very adequate.

To cover the possibility that Congress fails to fund the Initiatives process, then the final source can be philanthropic funds and the States.

3.5 By Direct Initiative passed by a double majority vote of the Electorate, the Boule may form Subsidiary Boules as necessary to perform separable work. Their Members shall have the same status as Members of the Boule but may serve for different periods.

For example, it may eventually prove best that a separate body should provide ballot opinions to the voters about the Candidate Initiatives.



4.1 The Congress, the President, the Courts and the States shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation, executive authority, judgment, and action. They shall implement expeditiously and cooperatively the intentions of this Amendment and as outlined by the reference documents "Government Actions" and "Boule Rules."

They shall convene the Boule within one year of this Amendment's ratification. If a first branch of government fails its obligation while a second has the ability, then the second shall exercise that power. These obligations shall continue upon successor Congresses, Presidents, Courts, and States until the People by Direct Initiative affirm that the intentions of this Amendment have been satisfied.

Implementation details are not appropriate in the Constitution and are therefore in a reference document. These Government Actions can never be sufficiently precise to ensure absolute compliance. In the event that a recalcitrant Congress, President, Courts, or States should fail their obligations, these obligations shall fall upon other branches that can fulfill the obligations in full or in part, or shall fall upon their successors. This will permit the People to use their electoral vote to enforce compliance. Although the Amendment requires governments' cooperation, the Boule can always remedy any defects by Initiative—its initial convocation should take place on time despite any defect or reason.

4.2 The Governments shall not tolerate any law, regulation or actions that impede or limit the use of U.S. Initiatives or the Boule’s access to information. The Governments shall preserve, protect and defend Initiatives, the Boule, and its independence. During the time periods specified by the Boule, the Governments shall protect, defend, and punish violation of, the Boule's and each Member's and family's privacy, freedom from tampering, freedom from press, media intrusion or exploitation, and failure of duty to serve. Punishments shall penetrate all shields to reach decision makers, include mandatory jail terms, and use fines based on percentage of assets.

Boule Members and their families are private persons. The Amendment must protect this status. The situation is similar to a Grand Jury except that the Boule would be even more tempting to media. The Member's status must be in the Amendment, or the Supreme Court might allow media access under Amendment 1. Corporate shields and vast assets protect the most potentially dangerous offenders; they must anticipate discomfort of punishment equally no matter their status.

4.3 This Amendment hereby adopts the reference document "Boule Rules" for the Boule and binds it to follow them. This Amendment does not incorporate the reference documents "Government Actions" and "Boule Rules."

By adopting the rules for the Boule, they become binding on the Boule yet not part of the Constitution. The Boule's Charter limits the Boule's authority to current needs and requires nationwide Initiatives to change these limits.

Guarantee Clause Clarification


5.1 Article IV, Section 4 of the United States Constitution shall be, and hereby is, amended by appending the following sentence: "State referendums, and United States and State initiatives selected or qualified by popular signature petition or a Boule, are consistent with and not a contravention of a republican form of government."

Though there are good reasons to believe that nationwide Initiatives are permissible under the Constitution's republican form of government, arguments can dispute this view. The Supreme Court has indicated that it might regard this as a political issue falling within congressional purview. This would be unacceptable, so this Amendment must resolve the issue.

Repeal Safeguard


6.1 This Amendment pre-authorizes that the People may repeal this Amendment. Article V of the United States Constitution shall be, and hereby is, amended by appending the following two sentences at the end of the second clause: "Ten years and again twenty years after a U.S. Direct Initiative first appears on nationwide ballot, the Boule shall include a Candidate Direct Initiative to repeal the Amendment when passed by a double majority vote. Should the Electorate choose repeal, Initiatives previously or concurrently passed shall remain as if they had originally been enacted by Congress and Congress may then change or overrule them as regular business of the Congress subject to Presidential approval."

This Amendment is for the benefit of the People who ordained and established the Constitution. Therefore, it is up to the People to repeal the Amendment if they find it unsatisfactory. Inclusion of a graceful repeal process is reassurance to some who otherwise might be unwilling to support it. With greater difficulty, a constitutional amendment may also repeal it—as Amendment XXI repealed prohibition.

State Ratification


7.1 The article shall be inoperative unless, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States, the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or if the Congress proposes them by conventions in three fourths thereof, shall have ratified it as an Amendment to the Constitution.

Congress has consistently added this standard clause to recent Amendments.

--- END ---



Download PDF and Print: Cover and Five Documents for State Legislator's Information Package

Cover Page for the Five Key Documents Introduction to Nationwide Initiatives Plan Reasons Why States Should Support the Plan State Bill and Constitutional Amendment Reference 1:  Government Actions Mandated Reference 2: Citizens' Boule Rules

Consolidated PDF Version of State Legislator's Information Package Including Cover and Five Documents



Follow Key Pages:Previous Next

Alphabetical Index Sub Topics Index Table of Contents Search This Site Help Send Comments FAQs

This website by Citizens for U.S. Direct Initiatives is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. © 2003-2013

Version 13.03
 November 07, 2013